The Investment HabitThe boring parts, done for thirty years

Risk & Allocation

Daily Resets Make A Leveraged Fund Path Dependent

A fund promising a multiple of an index's daily move rebalances every day, so its return over longer periods depends on the sequence of moves rather than the total.

A close-up view of two white dice with reflection on a smooth white surface, symbolizing luck and chance.
Photograph by ClickerHappy via Pexels
General information. This is journalism, not personalised financial advice. Figures, rates and rules change and vary by country — check current terms before acting. How we work.

A fund designed to deliver a multiple of an index's daily return does exactly that, one day at a time. Over longer periods, the result depends on the order in which the days occurred.

The objective is stated in days

These funds state their target as a multiple of the daily performance of an index. The prospectus is explicit that the objective applies to a single trading day.

To maintain that exposure, the fund adjusts its position at the end of each day so the following day starts at the intended multiple of a new base.

That daily adjustment is the mechanism. It is not an administrative detail but the reason longer-period results do not match the multiple.

Compounding turns sequence into outcome

Returns compound, which means each day's result is applied to the balance produced by the previous day rather than to the original amount.

A gain followed by a loss of the same size does not return to the starting point, and the effect is magnified when the daily moves themselves are magnified.

So an index that ends a month where it started can leave a leveraged fund below where it started, purely from the movement in between.

Volatility works against the holder

The size of that gap grows with the size of the daily swings. A period of choppy movement without direction erodes the fund's value while the index does nothing.

A sustained trend has the opposite effect, since compounding in one direction produces more than the stated multiple over the period.

Neither outcome is a malfunction. Both follow from a product that resets each day being held for longer than a day.

Costs sit on top of the arithmetic

Maintaining leveraged exposure involves borrowing or derivative positions, and the cost of both moves with short-term interest rates.

Daily rebalancing also generates transactions, so the fund trades continuously in a way that a straightforward index fund does not.

These expenses accrue daily, in the same manner as any fund's costs, and they apply to a position whose base is being reset regardless of what the holder intended.

Inverse products carry the same structure

Funds targeting the opposite of an index's daily move use the identical mechanism, with the same daily reset and the same dependence on sequence.

The asymmetry of percentage moves matters here as well, since losses and gains of equal proportion do not offset one another.

The prospectus for these funds states the daily objective plainly and discusses the longer-period effect directly, which makes it one of the few cases where reading the document settles the question entirely.

Questions readers ask

Is a target date fund a good default?

For somebody who would otherwise never adjust anything, it does a job that would not otherwise get done. It is weaker where a lot of your wealth sits outside it.

What does to versus through mean?

Whether the fund stops adjusting at the target date or continues reducing risk for years afterwards. The two produce quite different allocations on the day you retire.

Risk & Allocationriskallocationtarget datedefaults
Alastair Nguyen
Editor, The Investment Habit

Alastair edits The Investment Habit and believes most investing content is entertainment sold as advice.

Also by Alastair Nguyen