Getting Started
The annual review that takes twenty minutes
A long-term portfolio needs maintenance, not management. Here is the whole list.

What follows is the working version of reviewing a portfolio: the decisions in the order you actually meet them, with the reasoning attached.
Before you start
- Contribution rate is the variable most worth revisiting.
- Rebalance to target rather than to a view.
- Costs and account structure drift and are worth re-checking.
Check the contribution first
Increasing the monthly amount in line with income does more for the outcome than any adjustment to holdings. It is also the only lever entirely within your control. Setting an automatic annual increase removes the decision permanently.
Rebalance mechanically
Compare current allocation to target and correct anything that has drifted beyond your band. Doing this with new contributions rather than by selling avoids costs and, in taxable accounts, tax. The point is restoring the intended risk, not expressing a view about what will do well next.
Re-check the total cost
Platform pricing, fund charges and your own balance all change, and the cheapest structure at one size is not the cheapest at another. A short annual calculation catches a crossover that would otherwise persist for years.
Switching platforms is administrative and pays every subsequent year.
Confirm the wrapper is still right
Contribution allowances, employer matching and tax rules change, and so does your income. Using available tax-advantaged capacity before taxable accounts is usually the first-order check. Employer pension matching left unclaimed is the most commonly missed item on any review.
If that does not fit your week, it is not a failure of willpower.
Update the beneficiaries and the plan
Nominations on pensions and investment accounts are frequently set once and forgotten through major life changes. Re-reading your own written plan is also the moment to notice if your horizon or goal has genuinely changed. Neither takes long and both are ignored for years at a time.
The takeaway
Raise the contribution, rebalance to target, recheck the costs. That is the whole review.
The version you keep doing is the version that works.
Questions readers ask
Is once a year enough?
For a diversified long-horizon portfolio, yes. More frequent review increases activity without improving outcomes.
What if my allocation has drifted a long way?
Rebalance in stages if the tax or cost consequences are significant, and use new contributions to do as much of the work as possible.
Also by Joachim Brandt
- The decisions that only need making onceGetting Started
- Reading a fund fact sheet without being sold toFunds & Trackers
- Diversification is not the number of funds you ownFunds & Trackers

