The Investment HabitThe boring parts, done for thirty years

Getting Started

Waiting until you understand everything is a decision too

Delay feels like caution because it produces nothing visible. It is still a position, and it is one nobody chose deliberately.

A stylish workspace featuring a floral notebook, glasses, and pens on a wooden desk.
Photograph by Suzy Hazelwood via Pexels
General information. This is journalism, not personalised financial advice. Figures, rates and rules change and vary by country — check current terms before acting. How we work.

Everything here earned its place by changing an outcome. Nothing about delaying a first investment is included to round the number up.

What matters most

  • Money held in cash while you research is an allocation, not the absence of one.
  • Most first-time investing choices are reversible at modest cost.
  • The feeling of readiness usually arrives after acting rather than before.

Not deciding is a position

Money left in cash while you read is invested in cash, with whatever that does to its purchasing power over the period you wait. The pause does not feel like a choice because nothing appears on a statement to mark it. People consistently find errors of omission less painful than errors of commission, which is one reason omissions are made more often.

Describing the delay out loud as "I have chosen to hold everything in cash this year" makes it easier to judge on its merits.

Reading does not supply the missing feeling

What most people are waiting for is not another fact but a sense of certainty, and certainty about future returns is not available to anyone. There is no state of knowledge in which the next step becomes obvious, because the information that would make it obvious does not exist yet.

Someone who has read forty articles is usually no more decided than someone who has read four; they are better informed and equally hesitant. The remaining gap tends to close by acting at a small scale, not by continuing to read.

Separate the reversible from the permanent

A platform, a fund and a monthly amount can generally all be changed later, sometimes for a small fee and some paperwork. What cannot be recovered is time, because a contribution started later simply has fewer years in front of it.

On an ordinary week, the specific error is applying the caution appropriate to a permanent decision to one that is easily undone. Ask what being wrong would cost to correct, rather than what being wrong would cost forever.

The fear underneath is usually specific

Most delay traces back to a concrete fear: buying immediately before a fall, picking the wrong fund, or looking foolish. Written down, those fears are easier to size, and they turn out to have different weights from the ones they carry unstated.

In practice, picking a mainstream diversified fund and being wrong about it costs a great deal less than most beginners assume. Buying immediately before a fall is genuinely possible, which is a reason to plan for it rather than a reason to avoid starting.

A rule for the undecided

Committing a small monthly amount now and revisiting the size in six months converts an open question into a running experiment. The amount can be one you would not miss, because at this stage the purpose is to establish the mechanism, not the balance. Setting a date to review is what stops "small for now" quietly becoming permanent.

Anything specific to your circumstances, particularly tax and account choice, belongs with a regulated adviser in your own country.

If that does not fit your week, it is not a failure of willpower.

When waiting is the right answer

Money needed within the next couple of years, expensive short-term debt, or the absence of any cash buffer are all reasons to wait that have nothing to do with confidence. Those are separate financial questions with their own answers and they are worth resolving first. Waiting for a clearer market, by contrast, has no defined end condition and tends to extend indefinitely.

The distinction is whether the wait has a stated finishing line.

Everything above, in order of what to do first

  1. Not deciding is a position. Money left in cash while you read is invested in cash, with whatever that does to its purchasing power over the period you wait.
  2. Reading does not supply the missing feeling. What most people are waiting for is not another fact but a sense of certainty, and certainty about future returns is not available to anyone.
  3. Separate the reversible from the permanent. A platform, a fund and a monthly amount can generally all be changed later, sometimes for a small fee and some paperwork.
  4. The fear underneath is usually specific. Most delay traces back to a concrete fear: buying immediately before a fall, picking the wrong fund, or looking foolish.
  5. A rule for the undecided. Committing a small monthly amount now and revisiting the size in six months converts an open question into a running experiment.
  6. When waiting is the right answer. Money needed within the next couple of years, expensive short-term debt, or the absence of any cash buffer are all reasons to wait that have nothing to do with confidence.

The takeaway

Give the wait a finishing line, or admit that cash is the allocation you chose.

The version you keep doing is the version that works.

Questions readers ask

How much do I need to understand before starting?

Enough to explain in a sentence what you own, why you own it and what you will do if it falls. That is a much lower bar than most people set for themselves.

Is it worth starting with a very small amount?

It establishes the habit and the plumbing, which is the hard part. Watch fixed platform charges, which can be disproportionate on tiny balances in some markets.

Getting Startedprocrastinationinertiadecisionsstarting
Ceyda Aksoy
Contributing writer, The Investment Habit

Ceyda writes about getting started, and about how few decisions actually need making.

Also by Ceyda Aksoy