Funds & Trackers
Securities lending inside a fund and who keeps the fee
Funds can lend their holdings to other market participants for a fee, which introduces a small revenue stream and a set of risks that are disclosed but rarely read.

Many funds lend the securities they hold to other market participants in return for a fee. The practice is routine, disclosed, and largely invisible to the people who own the fund.
What the transaction involves
A borrower takes temporary possession of a security and provides collateral worth more than the security's value. The lender receives a fee for the period of the loan.
Borrowers are typically firms needing the security to settle a trade or to establish a position that requires holding it. The demand is operational rather than speculative in most cases.
The fund retains the economic exposure throughout. It continues to benefit from price movements and arranges for income on the security to be passed back to it.
The revenue is real but small
Lending income is modest relative to a fund's total return and varies enormously by holding. Widely held large securities earn very little because they are abundantly available.
Securities that are scarce or in high demand earn considerably more. A fund holding unusual assets can generate meaningfully more lending revenue than one holding common ones.
For trackers competing on cost, that revenue can offset part of the charge. It is one reason a fund can occasionally lag its index by less than its stated fee.
The split is where it gets interesting
Lending revenue is shared between the fund and the manager, and the proportion varies. Some managers return nearly all of it and others retain a substantial share.
The share retained is disclosed in fund documentation rather than in headline charge figures. Two funds with identical stated charges can therefore differ in what they hand back.
Disclosure requirements and permitted arrangements vary by jurisdiction and change over time, which is why practice differs between funds domiciled in different places.
The risks are collateral risks
The main risk is that a borrower fails while holding the security. The collateral is then sold to replace it, and the exposure is any shortfall between the two values.
Collateral is held in excess of the loan value and is revalued frequently to manage that gap. The quality of what is accepted as collateral is the substantive variable.
Cash collateral introduces a further consideration, since it is reinvested. What it is reinvested into determines whether an additional layer of risk has been added.
Where to find what a fund actually does
Annual reports state whether lending is used, the proportion of assets typically on loan, the revenue generated and how it was split.
Those figures are more informative than the policy statement, which usually just permits lending up to a limit that is rarely approached in practice.
None of this makes lending a reason to choose or avoid a fund on its own. It is a component of the cost and risk picture that headline charge comparisons leave out entirely.
Questions readers ask
Is it wrong to find investing interesting?
Not at all, but keep the interest and the portfolio separate. Problems begin when the appetite for engagement gets satisfied by changing holdings.
How do I make a boring portfolio feel worthwhile?
Track contributions and years, not weekly balances. Those are the measures that reflect what you actually did.
Also by Joachim Brandt
- The decisions that only need making onceGetting Started
- Reading a fund fact sheet without being sold toFunds & Trackers
- Diversification is not the number of funds you ownFunds & Trackers
- The annual review that takes twenty minutesGetting Started





